Painful vs. Non-Painful Exercise: Dr. E's Modern Manual Therapy
Edge Mobility System Logo

PAIN MATTERS: Exercise for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

A Modern Manual Therapy Update for Rehab Professionals

The Evidence: Painful vs. Non-Painful Approaches

Painful Exercise

  • Often involves moderate pain (up to 5/10 NPRS).
  • IMPROVES pain intensity.
  • IMPROVES disability.
  • **NO DIFFERENCE** in Quality of Life (QoL) or Kinesiophobia vs. non-painful.
  • Provides SHORT-TERM BENEFITS (4-12 weeks).
  • May be SUPERIOR for SOME, but not all patients.

Non-Painful Exercise

  • Aims for pain-free to mild pain (<3/10 NPRS).
  • IMPROVES pain intensity.
  • IMPROVES disability.
  • **NO DIFFERENCE** in Quality of Life (QoL) or Kinesiophobia vs. painful.
  • Provides SHORT-TERM BENEFITS (4-12 weeks).
  • Generally EFFECTIVE for MOST patients.

Key Finding (Tran et al., 2025):

Both painful and non-painful exercise approaches are effective in improving pain and disability in the short-term for chronic MSK pain.
There were no major differences in outcomes between the two strategies!

Dr. E's Take: What This Means for Your Practice

  • Focus on Patient Beliefs & Context: The "level" of pain matters less than the patient's interpretation and your education around it. Avoid fear-mongering.
  • Pain as a Guide, Not a Stop Sign: Mild-to-moderate pain during exercise (e.g., up to 5/10) that subsides quickly is generally acceptable and effective.
  • Optimal Strategy is Individualized: Respect patient preference. For highly kinesiophobic patients, pain-free is often the best starting point. For others, controlled, slightly painful movement can be part of their graded exposure.
  • The Best Exercise is the *Done* Exercise: Consistency and adherence are paramount. This review reinforces that both strategies work, so find what resonates and can be sustained by your patient.

Modern Manual Therapy: The Eclectic Approach to UQ and LQ Assessment and Treatment Online Seminar

5.0
$ 399.99
$ 199.99
$ 200.00