A Clinician's Guide to PRT vs. PNE
Logo

A Clinician's Guide to

PRT vs. PNE

Understanding the key differences between Pain Reprocessing Therapy and Pain Neuroscience Education.

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)

Core Concept: Pain Education

Focuses on reconceptualizing pain by explaining its underlying neurophysiology. It shifts the patient's view from a structural/mechanical problem to an overprotective nervous system, providing the "what" and "why" of their pain experience (Louw et al., 2016).

Method: Primarily Educational

Delivered through explanations, metaphors (e.g., "overactive alarm system"), and pictures to explain concepts like central sensitization. It's typically an adjunct to other physical therapy interventions like manual therapy and exercise.

Outcome Focus: Understanding & Enablement

Aims to decrease pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance, thereby enabling the patient to more confidently engage in active therapies. It prepares them for movement by changing their conceptual model of pain.

Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT)

Core Concept: Pain Reappraisal & Extinction

A systematic psychological therapy focused on helping patients reattribute primary (nociplastic) pain to reversible brain processes, not tissue damage. It provides the "how" to unlearn the pain response (Ashar et al., 2022).

Method: Systematic Protocol

A structured, multi-component system with objective steps. Its core technique, somatic tracking, gives patients an active tool to use during a pain experience: mindfully observing sensations through a lens of safety to create a corrective experience and extinguish fear (Gordon & Ziv, 2021).

Outcome Focus: Pain Reduction & Elimination

Aims for substantial and durable pain relief, with the goal of pain elimination. The landmark study showed 66% of PRT patients became pain-free or nearly pain-free, an outcome rarely seen in other psychological interventions for chronic pain (Ashar et al., 2022).

Learn Modern Manual Therapy

Integrate these concepts into your practice.

Earn CEUs

Get Started Now

References (APA 7th ed.)

Ashar, Y. K., Gordon, A., Schubiner, H., Uipi, C., Knight, K., Anderson, Z., Carlisle, J., Polisky, L., Geuter, S., Flood, T. F., Kragel, P. A., Dimidjian, S., Lumley, M. A., & Wager, T. D. (2022). Effect of pain reprocessing therapy vs placebo and usual care for patients with chronic back pain: A randomized clinical trial. *JAMA Psychiatry*, *79*(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669

Gordon, A., & Ziv, A. (2021). *The way out: A revolutionary, scientifically proven approach to healing chronic pain*. Vermilion.

Louw, A., Zimney, K., Puentedura, E. J., & Diener, I. (2016). The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. *Physiotherapy Theory and Practice*, *32*(5), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2016.1194646

Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000). Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. *Pain*, *85*(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0

Share this guide:

Modern Manual Therapy: The Eclectic Approach to UQ and LQ Assessment and Treatment Online Seminar

5.0
$ 399.99
$ 199.99
$ 200.00