The 2025 JOSPT Network Meta-Analysis of 161 RCTs is out: Specificity in Spinal Manual Therapy (SMT) is a myth. Targeted SMT is NOT superior to a general approach. In fact, general techniques showed the highest probability for short-term pain relief. Focus less on "locking out" the perfect segment and more on patient comfort, therapeutic alliance, and using SMT to create a window for immediate, active loading and exercise. Get with the program!
A 2025 JOSPT Network Meta-Analysis of 161 RCTs challenges the "perfect segment" myth.
We were taught to palpate for the "stuck" segment, lock it out, and thrust with precision. But does the exact location and specific technique actually change the patient outcome?
Comparing targeted vs. general SMT showed small, non-clinically relevant differences. You don't need to be a sniper to get results.
Surprisingly, a general, non-specific approach had the highest probability of achieving the largest short-term effects.
Clinicians should apply SMT based on patient preference and comfort rather than strict biomechanical rules.